kazushi_takagi: I’ve been thinking about the term “job type” that I’ve been hearing a lot lately, and how it relates to the Cybozu corporate structure and personnel system. I have been thinking about it in relation to the company organization and personnel system of Cybozu.
nishio: good article. I think there are a lot of people out there who have the misconception that “job type” is a great thing and that all good companies are job types.
nishio: It is a false dichotomy to think that employment in the world is divided into two types: “membership-based” and “job-based”.
nishio: wrote Membership-based or job-based employment is a false dichotomy
nishio: this is exactly what I’m talking about drawing on past dichotomies.
nishio: In a job-based “post first” system, if the need for a certain job decreases and a management decision is made to reduce the number of positions, the current workers are In contrast, in a membership-based system, people are decided first, so another post is decided first. On the other hand, in a membership-based system, the person is decided first, so a “personnel change” to a different post takes place.
nishio: Then what will Cybozu, having given up the right to transfer personnel, satisfy this need? This is the liberalization of the internal labor market. The market principle will work within the company by individuals are free to transfer between teams. Individuals are free to transfer between teams.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/サイボウズは「ジョブ型」なのか？ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.